I am pleased David Cameron has called for a review of the Libor scandal. Ed Milliband's call for a public enquiry is entirely opportunistic and, in truth, the last thing we need is a process that will last for ages and will report long after the fuss and the awareness has faded from the public mind.
However, one aspect of what Ed Milliband has said does make sense. The Libor review needs to look wider than just what went on over abuse of inter-bank lending. The whole scandal shows a complete lack of ethics and responsibility in the banking industry. Someone needs to be looking at how the industry has operated, investigate where other opportunities for abuse existed and find out if those opportunities were exploited.
Saturday, 30 June 2012
Cameron's Libor review needs to reach further
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
What do we mean by demographics?
Some of you will have heard politicians and council officers talking about demographics, particularly in relation to older people. So, I thought I would try and explain it and give some examples.
The definition from dictionary.com is "the statistical data of a population, especially those showing average age, income, education, etc. " often this relates to current data, but in the case of older people demographics is often used as part of the evidence base and in discussions around the forecasts for our ageing population.
I was shown this table the other day which provides a perfect example of demographics in Cambridgeshire in terms of increases in the older population.
Let's be plain - this comes about largely (but not entirely) because people are living longer - that is a great thing. But it also places a burden on social care services because we have to cope with an increasing number of people who need support. The challenge is how we deal with this in a world where we have less resource. These demographics are also the reason why the need for urgent reform of Health and Social Care is being reinforced to Government. Social Care is the biggest single item of spend in Cambridgeshire with a budget of around £188m. This graph, known as the Barnet Graph of Doom, shows how by 2030 Barnet could have no money to spend on anything other than children and adults - so no highways, libraries or anything else!
I would challenge this slightly. I believe there are ways we can get more efficient - for instance by making sure we are smarter with how we use technology to support vulnerable older people, and by being more preventative - for example by reducing isolation which has a huge impact on the health of older people (which is why our recently proposed Community Navigator scheme is important).
There are also bigger picture issues like better integration of health and social care to make it more seamless - which I think offers cost and service benefits (health care is provided via the NHS to provide support at home such as Occupational Therapy whereas Social Care provides basic services such as cleaning and is supported by the County Council and is sometimes charged for).
Interestingly, as I have been writing this I have been pointed to this interesting article about Health and Social Care, which explains some of the issues Nationally.
The definition from dictionary.com is "the statistical data of a population, especially those showing average age, income, education, etc. " often this relates to current data, but in the case of older people demographics is often used as part of the evidence base and in discussions around the forecasts for our ageing population.
I was shown this table the other day which provides a perfect example of demographics in Cambridgeshire in terms of increases in the older population.
Age
|
2012
|
2022
|
Increase
|
Total population aged 18-64
|
390,800
|
409,659
|
5%
|
People aged 65-69
|
33,700
|
35,608
|
6%
|
People aged 70-74
|
24,500
|
33,448
|
37%
|
People aged 75-79
|
19,700
|
28,175
|
43%
|
People aged 80-84
|
14,800
|
20,654
|
40%
|
People aged 85-89
|
9,200
|
13,234
|
44%
|
People aged 90 and over
|
5,500
|
9,502
|
73%
|
Total population 65 and over
|
107,400
|
140,620
|
31%
|
Total Cambridgeshire Population
|
498,200
|
550,279
|
10%
|
Let's be plain - this comes about largely (but not entirely) because people are living longer - that is a great thing. But it also places a burden on social care services because we have to cope with an increasing number of people who need support. The challenge is how we deal with this in a world where we have less resource. These demographics are also the reason why the need for urgent reform of Health and Social Care is being reinforced to Government. Social Care is the biggest single item of spend in Cambridgeshire with a budget of around £188m. This graph, known as the Barnet Graph of Doom, shows how by 2030 Barnet could have no money to spend on anything other than children and adults - so no highways, libraries or anything else!
I would challenge this slightly. I believe there are ways we can get more efficient - for instance by making sure we are smarter with how we use technology to support vulnerable older people, and by being more preventative - for example by reducing isolation which has a huge impact on the health of older people (which is why our recently proposed Community Navigator scheme is important).
There are also bigger picture issues like better integration of health and social care to make it more seamless - which I think offers cost and service benefits (health care is provided via the NHS to provide support at home such as Occupational Therapy whereas Social Care provides basic services such as cleaning and is supported by the County Council and is sometimes charged for).
Interestingly, as I have been writing this I have been pointed to this interesting article about Health and Social Care, which explains some of the issues Nationally.
Monday, 18 June 2012
Peer Review in Namibia
Peer review is a process that is now well embedded within UK local government, it is built on the idea of officers and councillors visiting local authorities and holding a mirror up to them based on a model of an ideal local council; reviewing the way they work and offering them support and advice about how they might improve. With the element of inspection and audit taken out, it becomes a friendly, honest process that offers genuine options for improvement.
I can’t comment on the specific recommendations that came out of our visit; it is for the Municipality of Otjiwarongo to decide how to disseminate our findings, but I do believe the trip was a big success. It was also enlightening, emotional and a great learning experience.
Something else that hit home to me was the profile local government takes in Namibia. Time and again we saw local government feature in the National news, indeed our arrival was headline news on their breakfast show’s 7 o’clock broadcast. Whilst scale is important here – Namibia has a population of less than two and a half million – local government only seems to get a mention Nationally in England if it is a real bad news story (such as the death of a child) and that is despite the numerous attempts by local authorities to be innovative and original; the good work of local government should be better recognised in our National media.
The principle of giving people a hand up rather than a hand out has long been one that Conservatives have understood, the Africa Peer Review project is about exactly that; success will ensure that local government in Namibia plays a greater role in moving the country forwards and will see a growth in peer review that will help improvement across the continent. I am proud to have been part of a project that has such positive ambitions.
On a lighter note, as an Arsenal fan, I was delighted to discover that Otjiwarongo's football team are known as "The Mighty Gunners" - so whilst I was there I was able to buy myself a shirt!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)