I have a number of reasons to take a close interest in
progress on the Alconbury development. As a Member of the Board of the LEP, I
am keen to see the Enterprize Zone deliver high quality jobs and significant
retained business rates income, which is central to the LEP's economic strategy
and its future funding prospects. I also worked on the Alconbury site at the beginning of my Civil Service career, so I have a sneaking interest because of that.
And as a Local Member, I also want to ensure that
Whittlesey sees its share of the spin-off benefits from Alconbury!
We also, of course, have a critical role in working with
our colleagues in Hunts District Council on the planning application for the
new commercial premises and homes that are being proposed for the Alconbury
Weald site.
We must ensure that what comes forward in housing is
accompanied by the appropriate provision for the people who will live there,
with facilities like education and transport being in place and fit for purpose
for residents, and so that the place augments the existing town of Huntingdon
and works well with surrounding villages.
As ever, we will take our planning input very seriously.
But, together with the Leader of the District Council, I am also keen that we
move through the planning process as quickly as possible.
We won't shirk from ensuring that the development is of the highest quality, but we want to make sure that our debates with Urban and Civic as developers of the site are constructive, well managed, and dealt with without undue delay.
This is in all our interests, as Alconbury has the
potential to be the most successful Enterprise Zone in the country. It
has fantastic transport connections, and is uniquely placed to make the most of
the links to the burgeoning hi-tech economy of Cambridge to the east, and the
manufacturing and engineering strengths in Peterborough to the north.
IS there any Section 106 levy to contribute to the additional burden for the A14 from this development?
ReplyDelete