I am somewhat upset by a letter that has gone out from Councillor Peter Downes.
Here is the text of that letter and the text of the associated flyer:
“Dear Clerk to the Governors/Governor or member of staff,
As more schools in Cambridgeshire consider the move to academy status I am writing to let you know about a topical community event which is taking place next week.
There will be a public meeting on 14th March, which will consist of a presentation on academies by County Councillor Peter Downes followed by a community discussion.
Would you please pass the information on to your governors and school staff. It would also be appreciated if you would notify pupils and parents at your school to facilitate an open community debate and broad range of views.
This information is being sent to all secondary schools in Cambridgeshire.
Full details are below and also attached as a flier.
Thank you.
Regards,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
COMMUNITY DISCUSSION
“Schools becoming ‘academies’ - a good Idea ... or not?”
Monday 14th March 2011
Gropius Hall,
Impington Village College,
New School Road,
Impington, CB24 9LX
at 7.30 p.m.
An opportunity for teachers, support staff, governors, parents and pupils to have a free and frank discussion of the key issues facing schools and our education system as some schools consider converting to ‘academies’.
What does it mean to be an ‘academy’?
How is it different from a ‘school’?
Who will be the governors and what are the extra risks and responsibilities?
What are the advantages?
What might it mean for teachers and other school staff?
What is the effect on other schools, other pupils and on the education system as a whole?”
Now let me ask you a few questions about that letter. Firstly, is there anything in it that suggests that this meeting has a party political bent, or does it suggest rather more that it is a Council endorsed affair?
Does it sound like this is a consultation? Does the use of the phrase “free and frank discussion” suggest that there is no particular angle to the debate?
Well, be in no doubt this is a Lib Dem run event, one that is organised to promote their anti-Academies propaganda.
Peter Downes is the Lib Dem spokesman for education who has become a one trick pony who no longer deals with education as a Lib Dem spokesman, just his anti-Academies mantra. He proposed the Lib Dem motion at their party conference last year that opposed academies, and has consistently spoken out opposing them.
I am not suggesting that you don't go along to this meeting, feel free - but go on the clear understanding that this is not about free and frank discussion, you will be going along to a meeting that is absolutely intended to give you one side of the story about Academies. Strangely one that supports some sort of socialist asset redistribution dogma.
Now that you know what the meeting is really about, if you feel that you have been deliberately misled by the way it is phrased, please write to your local paper, let them know how you feel and please, please remember how Lib Dems behave when you vote on May 5th.
Of course, at the heart of this is the innovative Academies bid from the Hunts Secondary schools, which includes St Neots - the Lib Dems recent history on St Neots schools is of opposing anything that moves them towards greater success.
In my capacity as a Cabinet Member I have made it plain that parents and Governors should look at academies with a view to whether it is right for their school, it is for the County Council to deal with any impact. We have set aside additional funding in our tough budget round to make sure we do that. Importantly think about what greater independence and freedom will mean for your school (or in the Hunts case - for your group of schools).
UPDATE: 16/4/2011. I have received an email from the signatory of the letter expressing the view that she is not a Liberal Democrat and suggesting that the inclusion of her name is a data protection issue. Whilst I disagree with her claim, because the letter was circulated in the public domain, I understand the author's wish not to be associated with the Liberal Democrats and, out of politeness, I have chosen to remove the name. Apparently this letter is also on totalpolitics.com, over which I have no editorial control (and I can't find the article). I still do not hold back from my claim about the Lib Dem's failing to be upfront about the intent of the meeting.